Cross-text Multiple Matching

Master comparative reading across texts. Learn to spot links, contrasts, and patterns between different sources on related topics.

Level C2⏱️ 90 min📋 Requires: Advanced reading comprehension, Critical analysis skills, Synthesis abilities
Topic Progress0%

What is Cross-text Multiple Matching?

Cross-text Multiple Matching is an advanced task where you relate information across several different texts. You compare, contrast, and connect ideas, opinions, or specific details that appear in multiple texts on related topics.

Types of links

💡
💡
💡

Advanced strategies

1. Concept mapping

Build a mental map of each text's main ideas.

Examples:
  • Identify the central theme of each text
  • List each author's main points
  • Note unique evidence or examples
  • Mark each text's conclusion

2. Comparative analysis

Compare elements across texts systematically.

Examples:
  • Which texts mention the same causes?
  • Which propose similar solutions?
  • Which authors share the same attitude?
  • Where is there clear agreement or disagreement?

3. Synthesising information

Combine material from several sources to answer.

Examples:
  • Link complementary ideas from different texts
  • Spot patterns that appear across texts
  • See when several texts support the same idea
  • Notice when one text contradicts others

Important rules

1. Precision in links

Connections must be exact, not vague.

Examples:
  • Check ideas are really similar, not just related
  • Distinguish partial agreement from full agreement
  • Do not assume unstated connections
  • Beware of superficial similarities

2. Multiple correct texts

Some questions may have more than one text as an answer.

Examples:
  • One question may apply to 2–3 texts
  • Some texts may answer no question
  • Read carefully if it asks for 'one', 'some', or 'all'
  • Consider every possibility before deciding

3. Levels of analysis

Analyse both explicit and implicit meaning.

Examples:
  • Information stated directly
  • Implicit attitudes and opinions
  • Underlying assumptions in each text
  • Implications of the conclusions
← Back to Theory